DePorter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

D. Arizona

DePorter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

DecidedMarch 7, 2022

Docket4:20-cv-00567

StatusUnknown

This text of DePorter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (DePorter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DePorter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, (D. Ariz. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 3 4 Hayley DePorter, No. CV-20-00567-TUC-JAS (LAB) 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 Vv. 7 Commissioner of — Social Security Administration, 9 Defendant. 10 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) issued by 11 || United States Magistrate Judge Leslie Bowman that recommends reversing the final || decision of the Commissioner. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not 13 || filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has || expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 15 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Bowman’s 16 || recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 20 Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) is accepted 91 || and adopted. The final decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further || proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall enter 93 || judgment and close the file in this case. 24 Dated this 7th day of March, 2022. 25 26 \ _ — ¢ a7 Honorable James A. Soto 28 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 3 4 Hayley DePorter, No. CV-20-00567-TUC-JAS (LAB) 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 Vv. 7 Commissioner of — Social Security Administration, 9 Defendant. 10 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) issued by 11 || United States Magistrate Judge Leslie Bowman that recommends reversing the final || decision of the Commissioner. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not 13 || filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has || expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 15 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Bowman’s 16 || recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 20 Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) is accepted 91 || and adopted. The final decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further || proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall enter 93 || judgment and close the file in this case. 24 Dated this 7th day of March, 2022. 25 26 \ _ — ¢ a7 Honorable James A. Soto 28 United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

DePorter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deporter-v-commissioner-of-social-security-administration-azd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack