DePorter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided March 7, 2022·No. 4:20-cv-00567·Unknown

Opinion

3 4 Hayley DePorter, No. CV-20-00567-TUC-JAS (LAB) 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 Vv. 7 Commissioner of — Social Security Administration, 9 Defendant. 10 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) issued by 11 United States Magistrate Judge Leslie Bowman that recommends reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not 13 filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 15 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Bowman’s 16 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 20 Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) is accepted 91 and adopted. The final decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk shall enter 93 judgment and close the file in this case. 24 Dated this 7th day of March, 2022. 25 26 \ _ — ¢ a7 Honorable James A. Soto 28 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DePorter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, (D. Ariz. 2022).

DePorter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (DePorter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conley v. Crabtree
14 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (D. Oregon, 1998)
Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp.
170 F.3d 734 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)