Depo v. Marine Midland Bank
429 N.E.2d 832, 54 N.Y.2d 943, 445 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3147
This text of 429 N.E.2d 832 (Depo v. Marine Midland Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Depo v. Marine Midland Bank, 429 N.E.2d 832, 54 N.Y.2d 943, 445 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3147 (N.Y. 1981).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. In [945]*945upholding the preclusion order, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment was properly granted.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kwiatek v. Buffalo Truck Sales & Service
178 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Caton v. Doug Urban Construction Co.
109 A.D.2d 1100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
429 N.E.2d 832, 54 N.Y.2d 943, 445 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/depo-v-marine-midland-bank-ny-1981.