Depo v. Marine Midland Bank
429 N.E.2d 832, 54 N.Y.2d 943, 445 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3147
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. In [945] upholding the preclusion order, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment was properly granted.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Depo v. Marine Midland Bank, 429 N.E.2d 832, 54 N.Y.2d 943, 445 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3147 (N.Y. 1981).
429 N.E.2d 832 (Depo v. Marine Midland Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kwiatek v. Buffalo Truck Sales & Service
178 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Caton v. Doug Urban Construction Co.
109 A.D.2d 1100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)