Depirro v. John N. Robins Co.
148 A.D. 923
Opinion
—Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Woodward [924]*924and Rich, JJ., concurred; Burr, J., dissented, on the ground that there was no proof of freedom from contributory negligence (Riceman v. Havemeyer, 84 N. Y. 647; Geoghegan v. Atlas Steamship Co., 3 Misc. Rep. 224, 228; 146 N. Y. 369, 371), and also that the requests to charge at folios 191 and 192 were improperly refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Depirro v. John N. Robins Co., 148 A.D. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).
148 A.D. 923 (Depirro v. John N. Robins Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Geoghegan v. Atlas Steamship Co.
146 N.Y. 369 (New York Court of Appeals, 1895)
Geoghegan v. Atlas Steamship Co.
22 N.Y.S. 749 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)