Depeyster v. Warne

2 Cai. Cas. 45, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 342
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1804·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is strong reason to believe that notice of retainer was duly served, and though no merits are sworn to, we cannot depart from our rules. Let the default, judgment, and all subsequent proceedings, be set aside with costs; but on condition that the defendant does not bring any action for false imprisonment.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Depeyster v. Warne, 2 Cai. Cas. 45, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 342 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

2 Cai. Cas. 45 (Depeyster v. Warne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Braseth v. County of Bottineau
100 N.W. 1082 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1904)