Depaulitte v. Depaulitte
This text of 2001 Ohio 229 (Depaulitte v. Depaulitte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 1201.]
DEPAULITTE, APPELLANT, v. DEPAULITTE, APPELLEE. [Cite as Depaulitte v. Depaulitte, 2001-Ohio-229.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-470—Submitted December 13, 2000—Decided January 31, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 17847. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ David R, Schmidt, for appellant Jacqueline J. Depaulitte. Donenfeld, Botros, Kollin & Schulte and Richard W. Schulte, for appellee Brian E. Depaulitte. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2001 Ohio 229, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/depaulitte-v-depaulitte-ohio-2001.