DePaul Health Center v. Noubarian

Missouri Court of Appeals

DePaul Health Center v. Noubarian

807 S.W.2d 202, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 531, 1991 WL 56003

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1991·No. No. 57930·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion to set aside a default judgment.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion to set aside a default judgment.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

DePaul Health Center v. Noubarian, 807 S.W.2d 202, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 531, 1991 WL 56003 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

807 S.W.2d 202 (DePaul Health Center v. Noubarian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.