Home/D.C. Circuit/Department of Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Department of Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

953 F.2d 687, 293 U.S. App. D.C. 291, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 38472, 1992 WL 20713
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1992
Docket91-1493
StatusUnpublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 953 F.2d 687 (Department of Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 953 F.2d 687, 293 U.S. App. D.C. 291, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 38472, 1992 WL 20713 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

Opinion

953 F.2d 687

293 U.S.App.D.C. 291

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND
FIREARMS, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent,
National Treasury Employees Union, Intervenor.

No. 91-1493.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 24, 1992.

Before WALD, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of the responses to the court's December 10, 1991 order to show cause why the petition for review should not be dismissed as untimely, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the petition for review be dismissed. The petition for review was not filed within the statutory period. See 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a) (a petition for review of a final Federal Labor Relations Authority order must be filed "during the 60-day period beginning on the date on which the order was issued...."). This court is therefore without authority to review the petition. See Channel One Systems, Inc. v. FCC, 848 F.2d 1305, 1306 (D.C.Cir.1988) (per curiam).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael E. Duvall v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General
953 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
Gary Davis v. Kim Salazar
953 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
Dow v. Nuclear Regulatory Com'n
953 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
Committee of Blind Vendors of the District of Columbia v. District of Columbia, Committee of Blind Vendors of the District of Columbia v. District of Columbia
953 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., Intervenors. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Anr Interstate Gas Company, Intervenors
953 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
Action on Smoking and Health v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and United States Department of Labor, Action on Smoking and Health v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and United States Department of Labor
953 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
In Re American Telephone and Telegraph Company
953 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
Curtis E. Crawford v. Director, D.C. Department of Corrections
953 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
Paul Fazzini v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts
953 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
Alabama Public Service Commission v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Csx Transportation, Inc., Intervenors
953 F.2d 687 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
In Re First Interstate Bank of Riverton, N.A.
953 F.2d 687 (First Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
953 F.2d 687, 293 U.S. App. D.C. 291, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 38472, 1992 WL 20713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-treasury-bureau-of-alcohol-tobacco-and-firearms-v-federal-cadc-1992.