Department of Transportation v. Robinson

424 So. 2d 883, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21938
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 17, 1982
DocketNo. AM-436
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 424 So. 2d 883 (Department of Transportation v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Transportation v. Robinson, 424 So. 2d 883, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21938 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellee, Brenda Lee Robinson, filed a complaint for wrongful death in Jackson County, Florida, naming as defendants, the Florida Department of Transportation (DOT), Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railroad Company (Bayline), and Jackson County. In her complaint Mrs. Robinson alleged, inter alia, that all three defendants failed to provide adequate or appropriate signal warning devices, as were their respective duties, at the railroad crossing where her husband was killed in a collision with a train operated by Bayline.

Appellant, DOT, filed a motion to dismiss, incorporating an alternative prayer for change of venue to Leon County, Florida, pursuant to its common law home venue privilege. Carlile v. Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 354 So.2d 362 (Fla.1977). On June 1, 1982, the trial court entered an order denying DOT’s motion and finding that venue was proper in Jackson County. Subsequent to that order, Mrs. Robinson and Jackson County entered into a settlement agreement. Because we find DOT’s venue privilege controlling here, we reverse the order of the trial court.

The common law venue privilege provides that, absent waiver or exception, “venue in civil actions brought against the state or one of its subdivisions properly lies in the county where the state, agency, or subdivision, maintains its principal headquarters.” Carlile, at 366. That principle has been consistently reaffirmed with few exceptions. See Florida Public Service Commission v. Triple “A” Enterprises, Inc., 387 So.2d 940 (Fla.1980); Department of Corrections v. Edwards, 410 So.2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); County of Volusia v. Atlantic International Investment Corp., 394 So.2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Department of Transportation v. Bromante, 365 So.2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); City of Boca Raton v. Walker, 354 So.2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

DOT has not waived its privilege and the circumstances are not so extraordinary as to provide an exception to the privilege. Cf. Grice v. Bd. of County Com’rs of Madison County, 413 So.2d 88 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), certified question docketed, no. 62,174 (Fla. June 10, 1982). Accordingly, the cause of action, as it affects only the Department of Transportation, should be transferred to Leon County, where DOT maintains its principal headquarters.1

MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barr v. Florida Bd. of Regents
644 So. 2d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Florida Department of Transportation v. McFadden
432 So. 2d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
424 So. 2d 883, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-transportation-v-robinson-fladistctapp-1982.