Department of Trade & Commerce of Nebraska v. Hertz

Supreme Court

Department of Trade & Commerce of Nebraska v. Hertz

260 U.S. 696, 43 S. Ct. 90, 67 L. Ed. 468, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2392

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 16, 1922·No. No. 557·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U.'S. 225; Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co., 228 U. S. 137, 144; De Rees v. Costaguta, 254 U. S. 166, 173; (2) Aspen Mining .& Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 31, 37; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325, 332-334; Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S.' 519, 521-522; Shapiro v. United States, 235 U. S. 412, 415-416.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U.'S. 225; Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co., 228 U. S. 137, 144; De Rees v. Costaguta, 254 U. S. 166, 173; (2) Aspen Mining .& Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 31, 37; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325, 332-334; Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S.' 519, 521-522; Shapiro v. United States, 235 U. S. 412, 415-416.

Department of Trade & Commerce of Nebraska v. Hertz, 260 U.S. 696, 43 S. Ct. 90, 67 L. Ed. 468, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2392 (1922).

Pincite

260 U.S. 696 (Department of Trade & Commerce of Nebraska v. Hertz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related