Department of Social Services v. Herbert R.

213 A.D.2d 636, 624 N.Y.S.2d 933
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 27, 1995·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—In consolidated child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the appeal is from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), entered June 25, 1992, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The record indicates that the respondent voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently stipulated to waive his right to appeal from the fact-finding adjudication in exchange for the agreed upon dispositional order. Having failed to show any grounds upon which to vacate the stipulation of settlement (see, Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224; Matter of Frutiger, 29 NY2d 143; Bellefleur v Gervais, 201 AD2d 524; Bailey v New York City Tr. Auth., 196 AD2d 854), the respondent cannot now appeal from the dispositional order or seek review of the fact-finding determination. Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Social Services v. Herbert R., 213 A.D.2d 636, 624 N.Y.S.2d 933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 636 (Department of Social Services v. Herbert R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kadosh v. Kadosh
2019 NY Slip Op 981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Cunha v. Shapiro
42 A.D.3d 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Guardino v. Kidd
305 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Stern v. Stern
304 A.D.2d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Christopher C.
284 A.D.2d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)