Department of Revenue v. Schultz

394 So. 2d 583, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18822
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 1981·No. Nos. 80-2101, 80-2116·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are asked to review an order which the trial court entered below subsequent to its order denying the appellants’ motion for change of venue. Recently, in a separate appeal this court reversed the order denying the motion for change of venue. Department of Revenue v. Schultz, 392 So.2d 926 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). Therefore, we vacate the order of November 6,1980, without prejudice to the parties to seek such interim relief as they may deem advisable in the appropriate forum. See Straughn v. Grootemaat, 291 So.2d 669 (Fla.2d DCA 1974); Dickinson v. Grootemaat, 291 So.2d 669 (Fla.2d DCA 1974).

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Revenue v. Schultz, 394 So. 2d 583, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18822 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

394 So. 2d 583 (Department of Revenue v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Straughn v. Grootemaat
291 So. 2d 669 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Dickinson v. Grootemaat
291 So. 2d 669 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Department of Revenue of the State v. Schultz
392 So. 2d 926 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)