Department of Revenue v. Schooff
752 P.2d 353, 90 Or. App. 430
This text of 752 P.2d 353 (Department of Revenue v. Schooff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Department of Revenue v. Schooff, 752 P.2d 353, 90 Or. App. 430 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
Defendants appeal the decision of the trial court denying their motion for attorney fees. The trial court ruled that the motion was not timely. The state properly concedes that the motion was timely and that the merits of the motion should have been considered.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
752 P.2d 353, 90 Or. App. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-revenue-v-schooff-orctapp-1988.