Department of Revenue v. Naranja Lakes Condominium
Opinion
Once the trial court determined that the Department of Revenue was entitled to collect a sales rental tax pursuant to Sec. 212.031, Fla.Stat. (1981)1 it erred in denying the Department the right to collect [177] back taxes for a 3 year period pursuant to Sec. 212.14(6), Fla.Stat. (1981).2
The appellee urges that retroactive application should not be permitted because of denial of equal protection, estoppel or selective enforcement. Under the pleadings and record in this case we find none of these positions sustainable. State ex rel. Dofnos Corporation v. Lehman, 100 Fla. 1401,131 So. 333 (1930); Department of Revenue v. Hobbs, 368 So.2d 367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, 429 U.S. 252, 97 S.Ct. 555, 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977); Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 82 S.Ct. 501, 7 L.Ed.2d 446 (1962); Liggett Company v. Lee, 288 U.S. 517, 53 S.Ct. 481, 77 L.Ed. 929 (1932).
Therefore, the final judgment under review is affirmed, insofar as it sustained the Department’s right to collect the tax, but is reversed in denying the department the right to collect 3 years back taxes pursuant to Sec. 212.14(6) Fla.Stat. (1981).
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
480 So. 2d 175 (Department of Revenue v. Naranja Lakes Condominium) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.