Department of Revenue v. Naranja Lakes Condominium
This text of 480 So. 2d 175 (Department of Revenue v. Naranja Lakes Condominium) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Once the trial court determined that the Department of Revenue was entitled to collect a sales rental tax pursuant to Sec. 212.031, Fla.Stat. (1981)1 it erred in denying the Department the right to collect [177]*177back taxes for a 3 year period pursuant to Sec. 212.14(6), Fla.Stat. (1981).2
The appellee urges that retroactive application should not be permitted because of denial of equal protection, estoppel or selective enforcement. Under the pleadings and record in this case we find none of these positions sustainable. State ex rel. Dofnos Corporation v. Lehman, 100 Fla. 1401,131 So. 333 (1930); Department of Revenue v. Hobbs, 368 So.2d 367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, 429 U.S. 252, 97 S.Ct. 555, 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977); Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 82 S.Ct. 501, 7 L.Ed.2d 446 (1962); Liggett Company v. Lee, 288 U.S. 517, 53 S.Ct. 481, 77 L.Ed. 929 (1932).
Therefore, the final judgment under review is affirmed, insofar as it sustained the Department’s right to collect the tax, but is reversed in denying the department the right to collect 3 years back taxes pursuant to Sec. 212.14(6) Fla.Stat. (1981).
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
480 So. 2d 175, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2783, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-revenue-v-naranja-lakes-condominium-fladistctapp-1985.