Department of Revenue v. Gurtler

381 So. 2d 242, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15565
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 3, 1979·No. No. 79-18·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

This cause is reversed and remanded with directions that the trial court enter a final judgment in favor of the appellant in accordance with “Defendants Exhibit # 2 received in evidence on 11/27/1978.”

In so directing, we would express our vexation that the trial judge, through no fault of his, was so misled, a happening which we have discovered through our persistent demands to supplement and correct the record pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(f).

In the Appellees’ reply to our latest order of August 15th, 1979, it is in effect conceded that their stated position on appeal was baseless. Thus, notwithstanding their success in the lower court, we find there to be a complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact. .This b.eing so, pursuant to Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1978), we hereby assess One thousand ($1,000) dollars in attorneys fees in favor of the appellant.

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH.

ANSTEAD, J., and CROSS, SPENCER, C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Revenue v. Gurtler, 381 So. 2d 242, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15565 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

381 So. 2d 242 (Department of Revenue v. Gurtler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.E. Medical Group, Inc. v. Frith
42 Fla. Supp. 2d 49 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1990)
TIE COMMUNICATIONS v. Toyota Motors
391 So. 2d 697 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)