Department of Revenue v. Cottrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Department of Revenue v. Cottrell

160 So. 3d 953, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5423, 2015 WL 1650761

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 2015·No. No. 1D14-4222·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Revenue correctly asserts that the Final Administrative Support Modification Order entered by the Administrative Law Judge was in error because the subject-matter jurisdiction of Division of Administrative Hearings was not properly invoked under section 409.2563, Florida Statutes (2014). See Dep’t of Revenue v. Dove, 152 So.3d 1278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). The order on appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Division of Administrative Hearings with instructions to enter an order directing the Department of Revenue to begin modification proceedings under section 409.2563.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CLARK, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Revenue correctly asserts that the Final Administrative Support Modification Order entered by the Administrative Law Judge was in error because the subject-matter jurisdiction of Division of Administrative Hearings was not properly invoked under section 409.2563, Florida Statutes (2014). See Dep’t of Revenue v. Dove, 152 So.3d 1278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). The order on appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Division of Administrative Hearings with instructions to enter an order directing the Department of Revenue to begin modification proceedings under section 409.2563.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CLARK, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Department of Revenue v. Cottrell, 160 So. 3d 953, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5423, 2015 WL 1650761 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

160 So. 3d 953 (Department of Revenue v. Cottrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related