Department of Revenue v. Continental Developers & Conversions, Inc.
506 So. 2d 436, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 826, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7286
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1987·No. No. 86-1870·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
We affirm the trial court’s determination that no use tax was owed by the owner of a yacht which the trial court was entitled to, and did, conclude never came to rest, but only temporarily stopped, in Florida solely for repairs to correct its unseaworthy condition while enroute to Texas where it was to be permanently berthed. See section 212.06(6), Florida Statutes (1983). Compare Wanda Marine Corp. v. State, 305 So.2d 65 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Department of Revenue v. Continental Developers & Conversions, Inc., 506 So. 2d 436, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 826, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7286 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
506 So. 2d 436 (Department of Revenue v. Continental Developers & Conversions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Department of Revenue v. Yacht Futura Corp.
510 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)