Department of Revenue v. Clara Luz Resendiz and Daniel Andres Maravilla

182 So. 3d 811
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 5, 2016
Docket15-0710
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 So. 3d 811 (Department of Revenue v. Clara Luz Resendiz and Daniel Andres Maravilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Revenue v. Clara Luz Resendiz and Daniel Andres Maravilla, 182 So. 3d 811 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM'.

The Florida Department of Revenue raises two issues in this appeal of a Final Administrative Support Order determining the child support obligation of Appellee Daniel Andres Maravilla (the father). In the first issue, the Department argues that the administrative law judge (ALJ) erred by concluding that he lacked authority to enter a support order exceeding the amounts set forth in the Department’s Proposed Final Administrative Support Order based on new information developed at an evidentiary hearing that would increase the father’s child support obligation under the statutory child support guidelines. In the second issue,, the Department argues that the Final Administrative Support Order is .not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Consistent with our opinion in Department of Revenue v. Reyes, No. 1D15-707, 181 So.3d 1270, 2015 WL 9584862 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 31, 2015), we resolve both issues by concluding that the ALJ was required to establish the father’s child support obligation based on the evidence presented at the hearing. By limiting the father’s child support obligation to the amounts contained in the proposed - order, notwithstanding the evidence presented, the Final Administrative Support Order is contrary to Florida law and not- supported by competent, substantial evidence. Accordingly, *812 we vacate.,the order and remand for further proceedings.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hernandez v. Dept. of Revenue
230 So. 3d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 So. 3d 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-revenue-v-clara-luz-resendiz-and-daniel-andres-maravilla-fladistctapp-2016.