Department of Revenue v. Brunner Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Department of Revenue v. Brunner Enterprises, Inc.

375 So. 2d 23, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15802

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 7, 1979

DocketNo. NN-27

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 375 So. 2d 23 (Department of Revenue v. Brunner Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Department of Revenue v. Brunner Enterprises, Inc., 375 So. 2d 23, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15802 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs, the record, and the oral argument presented by counsel we find this case is controlled by Stan Musial and Biggie’s, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 363 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); cert. granted, Case No. 55,711 Florida Supreme Court, and affirm.

We agree with the Fourth District Court of Appeal however that the question is one of great public interest, Roger Dean Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 371 So.2d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA) [rehearing granted, 1 FLW 64,1979], cert. granted, Case No. 55,971 Florida Supreme Court. Therefore we certify the question to the Supreme [24]*24Court: Is the gain from an out-of-state sale of stock held by a foreign corporation doing business in Florida taxable under the Florida Corporate Income Tax Code, and if so what method of computation should be used?

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs, the record, and the oral argument presented by counsel we find this case is controlled by Stan Musial and Biggie’s, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 363 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); cert. granted, Case No. 55,711 Florida Supreme Court, and affirm.

We agree with the Fourth District Court of Appeal however that the question is one of great public interest, Roger Dean Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 371 So.2d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA) [rehearing granted, 1 FLW 64,1979], cert. granted, Case No. 55,971 Florida Supreme Court. Therefore we certify the question to the Supreme [24]*24Court: Is the gain from an out-of-state sale of stock held by a foreign corporation doing business in Florida taxable under the Florida Corporate Income Tax Code, and if so what method of computation should be used?

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 So. 2d 23, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-revenue-v-brunner-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack