Department of Revenue ex rel. Lamidi v. Osagie
229 So. 3d 1289
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 27, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D16-3584·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm without discussion. We further strike appellee’s answer brief to the extent it seeks affirmative relief because appellee failed to file a cross-appeal. See Premier Indus. v. Mead, 595 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); A-1 Racing Specialties, Inc. v. K & S Imports of Broward Cty., Inc., 576 So.2d 421, 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Department of Revenue ex rel. Lamidi v. Osagie, 229 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
229 So. 3d 1289 (Department of Revenue ex rel. Lamidi v. Osagie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florida Department of Revenue, on behalf of Sharon Wind v. Mark Cochran
253 So. 3d 731 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)