Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission

720 A.2d 1111, 247 Conn. 341, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 449

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedDecember 29, 1998

DocketSC 15934

StatusPublished

This text of 720 A.2d 1111 (Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission, 720 A.2d 1111, 247 Conn. 341, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 449 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated appeals arise from decisions rendered by the named defendant, the freedom of information commission, in connection with complaints that had been filed with it by the defendant Shirley Vigneri. The plaintiffs, the department of public safety, division of state police, and two of its employees, Gerald Gore and Michael Bochiccio, appealed from those decisions to the trial court pursuant to General Statutes §§ l-21i (d) and 4-183. The trial court rendered judgment sustaining the plaintiffs’ appeal in part.

Although we do not endorse all of the trial court’s reasoning, we believe that under the circumstances, the result reached is correct and we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated appeals arise from decisions rendered by the named defendant, the freedom of information commission, in connection with complaints that had been filed with it by the defendant Shirley Vigneri. The plaintiffs, the department of public safety, division of state police, and two of its employees, Gerald Gore and Michael Bochiccio, appealed from those decisions to the trial court pursuant to General Statutes §§ l-21i (d) and 4-183. The trial court rendered judgment sustaining the plaintiffs’ appeal in part.

Although we do not endorse all of the trial court’s reasoning, we believe that under the circumstances, the result reached is correct and we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

720 A.2d 1111, 247 Conn. 341, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-public-safety-v-freedom-of-information-commission-conn-1998.