Department of Insurance of Indiana v. Highway Insurance Co.

170 So. 2d 464
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 12, 1965·No. No. 64-828·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, by this interlocutory appeal, claims error on the part of the trial court in denying its motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over it.

Appellant’s contention is without merit inasmuch as this is an action in rem regarding title to real property in Florida.1 The service of process was made as provided by §§ 48.01 & 48.02, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Appellant does not claim that appellee failed to comply with this statute, and since the action is one properly within that statute then the court acquired jurisdiction over the subject matter of the litigation. Therefore, the trial court properly denied the appellant’s motion.

The order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Insurance of Indiana v. Highway Insurance Co., 170 So. 2d 464 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

170 So. 2d 464 (Department of Insurance of Indiana v. Highway Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colburn v. Highland Realty Co.
153 So. 2d 731 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)