Department of Human Services v. R. F.
This text of 391 P.3d 993 (Department of Human Services v. R. F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this dependency case, mother appeals a juvenile court judgment terminating her parental rights to her daughter on the ground of unfitness, ORS 419B.504. We reject without written discussion mother’s first assignment of error. In her second assignment of error, mother contends that the juvenile court erred in terminating her parental rights because the Department of Human Services (DHS) failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is presently unfit to parent by reason of “conduct or condition seriously detrimental to the child,” that integration of the child into mother’s care is improbable within a reasonable time due to conduct or conditions not likely to change, and that termination is in the best interests of the child. ORS 419B.504; ORS 419B.500.
A discussion of the facts of this case would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3)(a), we conclude that the juvenile court properly terminated mother’s parental rights for unfitness under ORS 419B.504 and that termination is in the best interests of the child.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
391 P.3d 993, 284 Or. App. 669, 2017 WL 1244366, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-human-services-v-r-f-orctapp-2017.