Department of Human Services v. P. M. M.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Department of Human Services v. P. M. M.

389 P.3d 1176, 282 Or. App. 725, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1521

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedDecember 7, 2016

Docket2012808441; Petition Number 109425; A162184

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 389 P.3d 1176 (Department of Human Services v. P. M. M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Department of Human Services v. P. M. M., 389 P.3d 1176, 282 Or. App. 725, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1521 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Mother appeals an order establishing guardianship of her child under ORS 419B.366. After filing her appeal, the trial court granted child’s motion under ORS 419B.923 to set aside the guardianship order. Subsequently, mother filed a notice of probable mootness of mother’s appeal of the guardianship order. Both the Department of Human Services and child agree with mother that, because the trial court set aside the guardianship order, this appeal is moot. See, e.g., Dept. of Human Services v. J. G., 239 Or App 261, 264, 244 P3d 385 (2010) (“A case is moot when the court’s decision will not have a practical effect on the parties’ rights.”). We agree with the parties and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal as moot.

Appeal dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Mother appeals an order establishing guardianship of her child under ORS 419B.366. After filing her appeal, the trial court granted child’s motion under ORS 419B.923 to set aside the guardianship order. Subsequently, mother filed a notice of probable mootness of mother’s appeal of the guardianship order. Both the Department of Human Services and child agree with mother that, because the trial court set aside the guardianship order, this appeal is moot. See, e.g., Dept. of Human Services v. J. G., 239 Or App 261, 264, 244 P3d 385 (2010) (“A case is moot when the court’s decision will not have a practical effect on the parties’ rights.”). We agree with the parties and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal as moot.

Appeal dismissed as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 P.3d 1176, 282 Or. App. 725, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-human-services-v-p-m-m-orctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack