Department of Human Services v. P. M. M.

389 P.3d 1176, 282 Or. App. 725, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1521
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 7, 2016·No. 2012808441; Petition Number 109425; A162184·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Mother appeals an order establishing guardianship of her child under ORS 419B.366. After filing her appeal, the trial court granted child’s motion under ORS 419B.923 to set aside the guardianship order. Subsequently, mother filed a notice of probable mootness of mother’s appeal of the guardianship order. Both the Department of Human Services and child agree with mother that, because the trial court set aside the guardianship order, this appeal is moot. See, e.g., Dept. of Human Services v. J. G., 239 Or App 261, 264, 244 P3d 385 (2010) (“A case is moot when the court’s decision will not have a practical effect on the parties’ rights.”). We agree with the parties and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal as moot.

Appeal dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Human Services v. P. M. M., 389 P.3d 1176, 282 Or. App. 725, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1521 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).

389 P.3d 1176 (Department of Human Services v. P. M. M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of New York Mellon v. Brantingham
464 P.3d 1143 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)