Department of Human Services v. A. L. B.

342 P.3d 1116, 268 Or. App. 667, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 55
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 22, 2015
DocketJ140102; A157100
StatusPublished

This text of 342 P.3d 1116 (Department of Human Services v. A. L. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Human Services v. A. L. B., 342 P.3d 1116, 268 Or. App. 667, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 55 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Parents appeal from a juvenile court judgment assuming jurisdiction over their child, under ORS 419B.100(l)(c), based on allegations and findings that the child’s condition or circumstances endanger his welfare because both parents have a chemical abuse issue involving controlled substances, including methamphetamine. The Department of Human Services (DHS) concedes that the evidence with respect to father is not sufficient and that, therefore, the juvenile court erred in assuming jurisdiction. See Dept. of Human Services v. W. A. C., 263 Or App 382, 394, 328 P3d 769 (2014) (juvenile court jurisdiction is not warranted if one parent is able to safely parent the child). We agree with DHS that the evidence is not sufficient with respect to father and accept DHS’s concession of error. We therefore reverse the jurisdictional judgment.1

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Human Services v. W. A. C.
328 P.3d 769 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 P.3d 1116, 268 Or. App. 667, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-human-services-v-a-l-b-orctapp-2015.