Department of Human Services v. A. E.
This text of 243 P.3d 138 (Department of Human Services v. A. E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mother appeals a permanency judgment changing the case plan from reunification to adoption. She argues, among other contentions, that the juvenile court erred in failing to make and include in the judgment the statutorily required findings. ORS 419B.449(2); ORS 419B.476(2), (5). The state concedes that the judgment is deficient and should be remanded in order for the juvenile court to include the required findings and determinations. See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. J .F. B., 230 Or App 106, 115, 214 P3d 827 (2009) (remanding for juvenile court to enter judgments that comply with ORS 419B.476). We agree with and accept the state’s concession. Given our remand, we do not reach the other issues mother raises on appeal. See id. at 118 (“The other issues raised by mother on appeal are premature at this time.”).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 P.3d 138, 238 Or. App. 752, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-human-services-v-a-e-orctapp-2010.