Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. Mill River Realty, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. Mill River Realty, Inc.

624 N.E.2d 690, 82 N.Y.2d 794, 604 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 5242

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 1993·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Appeal, by respondents from that portion of the Appellate Division order which reinstated the Civil Court order entered June 30, 1988, dismissed, without costs, and certified question, insofar as it pertains to that portion of the Appellate Division order, not answered upon the ground that the issues presented on that part of the appeal have become moot. Order, insofar as it reinstated the Civil Court order entered August 30, 1988, affirmed, with costs, and certified question, to the extent it pertains to that part of the Appellate Division order, answered in the affirmative, for reasons stated in so much of the [799] Appellate Division memorandum (169 AD2d 665) as relates to the contempt against respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Levine. Taking no part: Judge Smith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Appeal, by respondents from that portion of the Appellate Division order which reinstated the Civil Court order entered June 30, 1988, dismissed, without costs, and certified question, insofar as it pertains to that portion of the Appellate Division order, not answered upon the ground that the issues presented on that part of the appeal have become moot. Order, insofar as it reinstated the Civil Court order entered August 30, 1988, affirmed, with costs, and certified question, to the extent it pertains to that part of the Appellate Division order, answered in the affirmative, for reasons stated in so much of the [799] Appellate Division memorandum (169 AD2d 665) as relates to the contempt against respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Levine. Taking no part: Judge Smith.

Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. Mill River Realty, Inc., 624 N.E.2d 690, 82 N.Y.2d 794, 604 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 5242 (N.Y. 1993).

Pincite

624 N.E.2d 690 (Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. Mill River Realty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related