Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles/Division of Risk Management v. Romano
This text of 948 So. 2d 815 (Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles/Division of Risk Management v. Romano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of the employer/carrier’s (E/C) response to this court’s order to show cause dated December 4, 2006, the court has determined that the order on appeal is not a reviewable adverse order. See Crown Pontiac, Inc. v. Bell, 547 So.2d 290 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). If, in the future, claimant files another petition for benefits seeking benefits from the E/C, the E/C may assert their affirmative defense of misrepresentation at that time.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
948 So. 2d 815, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 103, 2007 WL 43555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-highway-safety-motor-vehiclesdivision-of-risk-management-fladistctapp-2007.