Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Ramnarine

104 So. 3d 1144, 2012 WL 5935972, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20326
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 28, 2012·No. No. 2D12-1842·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. See Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Robinson, 93 So.3d 1090 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), petition for review filed, No. SC12-1874 (Fla. Sept. 5, 2012). However, as we did in Robinson, we certify the following question of great public importance to the supreme court pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

WHEN A SUSPENDEE SEEKS FORMAL REVIEW OF A DRIVER’S LICENSE SUSPENSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 322.2615(a), FLORIDA STATUTES, IS IT A VIOLATION OF DUE [1145] PROCESS TO SUSPEND THE LICENSE AFTER A SUBPOENAED WITNESS FAILS TO APPEAR AND THE SUSPENDEE CANNOT ENFORCE THE SUBPOENA WITHIN THE STATUTORILY MANDATED THIRTY-DAY PERIOD FOR FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW?

NORTHCUTT and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Ramnarine, 104 So. 3d 1144, 2012 WL 5935972, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20326 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

104 So. 3d 1144 (Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Ramnarine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Corcoran
133 So. 3d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Echternach v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles
119 So. 3d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)