Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Moss

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Moss

539 So. 2d 1196, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 793, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1555, 1989 WL 27940

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 29, 1989

DocketNo. 88-0862

StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 1196 (Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Moss, 539 So. 2d 1196, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 793, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1555, 1989 WL 27940 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

GUNTHER, Judge.

We reverse and remand to the trial court with instructions to issue a rule to show cause on the appellant’s petition filed pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Statute, section 932.704, Florida Statutes (1987).

In the instant case, the factual allegations of this petition were sufficient to state a cause of action because they established probable cause for believing that the contraband forfeiture statute had been violated. Based on the sufficiency of the petition itself, the trial court should have issued a rule requiring the appellee to show cause why the currency should not be forfeited to the state pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $5,300, 429 So.2d 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Therefore, we reverse and remand with instructions to issue the rule to show cause and for further proceedings consistent with the procedure established in In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $5,300, 429 So.2d 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GUNTHER, Judge.

We reverse and remand to the trial court with instructions to issue a rule to show cause on the appellant’s petition filed pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Statute, section 932.704, Florida Statutes (1987).

In the instant case, the factual allegations of this petition were sufficient to state a cause of action because they established probable cause for believing that the contraband forfeiture statute had been violated. Based on the sufficiency of the petition itself, the trial court should have issued a rule requiring the appellee to show cause why the currency should not be forfeited to the state pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $5,300, 429 So.2d 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Therefore, we reverse and remand with instructions to issue the rule to show cause and for further proceedings consistent with the procedure established in In re U.S. Currency in Amount of $5,300, 429 So.2d 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 So. 2d 1196, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 793, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1555, 1989 WL 27940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-highway-safety-motor-vehicles-v-moss-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack