Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Meinken
This text of 55 So. 3d 629 (Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Meinken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles petitions for a writ of cer-tiorari to review a decision of an appellate panel of the Ninth Judicial Circuit. The circuit court had issued its Order Granting Respondent, Bradford Meinken’s, Petition for Writ of Certiorari, quashing the hearing officer’s administrative decision upholding the suspension of his license for driving under the influence of alcohol. The panel held that Respondent had rebutted the presumption that the Intoxilyzer 8000 on which he performed his breath test was properly approved for use in Florida. We grant the writ and quash the decision of the circuit court on the authority of Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Berne, 49 So.3d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED; and decision QUASHED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 So. 3d 629, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1073, 2011 WL 335305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-highway-safety-motor-vehicles-v-meinken-fladistctapp-2011.