Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. McClung
This text of 878 So. 2d 480 (Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. McClung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Given the record demonstrating that the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, afforded procedural due process and applied the correct law, we conclude that the petitioner has failed to satisfy its burden for certiorari relief. See City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624, 626 (Fla.1982); Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Trimble, 821 So.2d 1084, 1086-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (holding that in certiorari proceeding to review driver’s license suspension, circuit court did not impermissibly re-weigh evidence in concluding that competent, substantial evidence did not support hearing officer’s finding, where evidence gave equal support to inconsistent inferences and could not be deemed sufficiently reliable that a reasonable mind would accept it as adequate). The petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
878 So. 2d 480, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11334, 2004 WL 1697838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-highway-safety-motor-vehicles-v-mcclung-fladistctapp-2004.