Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Lo Bianco

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Lo Bianco

431 So. 2d 229, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20712

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 4, 1983

DocketNo. AM-205

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 431 So. 2d 229 (Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Lo Bianco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Lo Bianco, 431 So. 2d 229, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20712 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The employer/carrier appeals from an order of the deputy commissioner awarding workers’ compensation benefits to claimant. We find competent substantial evidence to support the deputy’s award, including the provision for payment of Dr. Feldman’s medical bills. However, we remand for further proceedings at which uncertainty concerning the amount of his charges can be removed by the submission in evidence of written bills or statements. See American Grinding & Equipment v. Rodman, 411 So.2d 917 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Decks, Inc. of Florida v. Wright, 389 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Affirmed in part and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The employer/carrier appeals from an order of the deputy commissioner awarding workers’ compensation benefits to claimant. We find competent substantial evidence to support the deputy’s award, including the provision for payment of Dr. Feldman’s medical bills. However, we remand for further proceedings at which uncertainty concerning the amount of his charges can be removed by the submission in evidence of written bills or statements. See American Grinding & Equipment v. Rodman, 411 So.2d 917 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Decks, Inc. of Florida v. Wright, 389 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Affirmed in part and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

431 So. 2d 229, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-highway-safety-motor-vehicles-v-lo-bianco-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack