Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Chambers

472 So. 2d 1358, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1817, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14412
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 26, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1563
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 472 So. 2d 1358 (Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Chambers, 472 So. 2d 1358, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1817, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14412 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) appeals a nonfinal order directing Jeffery Chambers and Grace Johnson to submit to blood tests for the purpose of determining the paternity of a child. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and grant the writ.

Pursuant to chapter 39, Florida Statutes (1983), a petition was filed in the Hillsbor-ough County Circuit Court on July 6, 1978, requesting the court to adjudicate Reginald Chambers a dependent child. The child had been receiving public assistance from the state of Florida.

Several days later, Chambers signed an acknowledgment of paternity and agreed to have an order entered by the court requiring him to support the child. In addition to the acknowledgment, Chambers signed a stipulation with the Child Support Enforcement Division of HRS agreeing to pay $20.00 per week child support beginning on July 24, 1978. The court, thereafter, entered an order finding the child dependent and directing Chambers to pay the stipulated amount of support.

In 1984, Chambers filed a motion to vacate the order of support and acknowledgment of paternity. At the hearing on the motion, Grace Johnson, Reginald’s mother, testified that Chambers may not be the father of the child because she “had dealings with another man” and because “Jeffery says he is sterile.” Chambers testified that he could not have fathered the child as he was incarcerated at the time Grace Johnson became pregnant. Chambers further alleged that his mother informed him that he may be sterile due to a childhood disease.

The court scheduled a second hearing to allow an appearance by HRS.1 No addi[1360]*1360tional testimony was presented at the later hearing but HRS argued that the paternity matter was rendered res judicata by the 1978 proceedings. Nonetheless, the court granted Chambers’ request for the Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) blood tests and held in abeyance all child support until further order of the court.

We agree with HRS that the court departed from the essential requirements of law in ordering the blood tests. The paternity question was resolved six years ago by Chambers’ acknowledgment of paternity and by the court’s order awarding child support. As such, res judicata principles preclude Chambers from now attempting to relitigate the same issue. Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So.2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). In Johnson, while we recognized the current admissibility of the HLA tests in paternity litigation, we held that that did not authorize the court to reopen proceedings and relitigate matters previously decided.

Accordingly, we vacate the order entered herein and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

RYDER, C.J., DANAHY, J., and FO-GLE, HARRY W., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

P.G. v. E.W.
75 So. 3d 777 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Florida Dept. of Revenue v. MLS
756 So. 2d 125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Department of Revenue ex rel. Haynes v. Allen
717 So. 2d 130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Kunhardt
711 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Knight v. Simms
705 So. 2d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES v. Day
615 So. 2d 176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Schaffer v. Overby
613 So. 2d 128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Eller v. Thomas
586 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Miller v. Cowart
546 So. 2d 768 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
DEPT. OF H. & R. SERV. v. Chambers
472 So. 2d 1358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 So. 2d 1358, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1817, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-health-rehabilitative-services-v-chambers-fladistctapp-1985.