Department of Environmental Resources v. Anthony

64 Pa. D. & C.2d 626
Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board·Decided November 19, 1973·No. Docket no. 73-356-W·Published

Opinion

WATERS, Member of the Board,

This case is being decided on the basis of a motion to dismiss filed by Springfield Associates, questioning the jurisdiction of this board over the subject matter of this appeal.

We have concluded that we do not have jurisdiction. The “action of the Department” being appealed from is the department’s acceptance of certain acts and submissions of Springfield Associates as compliance with a consent order dated December 28, 1972. Essentially, the appellants seek enforcement of that consent order, as interpreted by them.

This board has no power to enforce orders of the department; that is a matter for the courts.

ORDER

And now, November 19, 1973, after due consideration of the motion to dismiss the appeal taken in the above matter from a consent agreement of December 28,1972, the motion is hereby granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Environmental Resources v. Anthony, 64 Pa. D. & C.2d 626 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1973).

64 Pa. D. & C.2d 626 (Department of Environmental Resources v. Anthony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.