Department of Environmental Quality v. Rexair, Inc.

761 N.W.2d 91, 482 Mich. 1009, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 1928
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 3, 2008
Docket136700
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 761 N.W.2d 91 (Department of Environmental Quality v. Rexair, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Environmental Quality v. Rexair, Inc., 761 N.W.2d 91, 482 Mich. 1009, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 1928 (Mich. 2008).

Opinion

761 N.W.2d 91 (2008)

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
REXAIR, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 136700. COA No. 272652.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 3, 2008.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REINSTATE the August 7, 2006 order of the Ingham Circuit Court. The Court of Appeals erred by holding that the circuit court lacked the inherent authority, as well as the authority under the consent judgment, the Michigan Rules of Court, and MCL 600.611, to dismiss with prejudice the dispute resolution proceeding initiated by the plaintiff and to award the defendant costs and attorney fees. The Court of Appeals further erred by disregarding the undisputed facts in the record that supported the circuit court's findings and by failing to accord the proper deference to the circuit court's determination that the plaintiff had invoked the circuit court's jurisdiction for an improper purpose and abused the dispute resolution process. Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co., 476 Mich. 372, 376, 719 N.W.2d 809 (2006).

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., concur in the result.

WEAVER, J. (concurring in the result only).

I concur only with the decision to reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the August 7, 2006, order of the Ingham Circuit Court.

In Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co., 476 Mich. 372, 426-435, 719 N.W.2d 809 (dissenting opinion by Weaver, J.), I disagreed with the majority opinion for the reasons stated in my dissent. Therefore, I find the citation to Maldonado in this order to be unnecessary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kruse v. CORT FURNITURE RENTAL
761 N.W.2d 91 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
761 N.W.2d 91, 482 Mich. 1009, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 1928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-environmental-quality-v-rexair-inc-mich-2008.