Department of Corrections v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Department of Corrections v. Smith

169 A.3d 24, 2017 WL 1159035, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 699

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 28, 2017·No. No. 12 EM 2017·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2017, the Application for Summary Relief is DENIED.

The “Writ of Mandamus to Compel” is GRANTED. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to docket, within 15 days, the matter that had been transferred from the Commonwealth Court. See Dept. ofCorr. v. Smith, 429 MD 2013 (order dated July 29, 2014). The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is further DIRECTED to adjudicate the transferred matter within 90 days of docketing.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2017, the Application for Summary Relief is DENIED.

The “Writ of Mandamus to Compel” is GRANTED. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to docket, within 15 days, the matter that had been transferred from the Commonwealth Court. See Dept. ofCorr. v. Smith, 429 MD 2013 (order dated July 29, 2014). The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is further DIRECTED to adjudicate the transferred matter within 90 days of docketing.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Department of Corrections v. Smith, 169 A.3d 24, 2017 WL 1159035, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 699 (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

169 A.3d 24 (Department of Corrections v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.