DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI-CAMP HILL v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

934 A.2d 1149, 594 Pa. 34, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2110
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 4, 2007·No. Appeal 272 MAL 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Commonwealth Court’s decision and order is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of our decision in Navickas v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 567 Pa. 298, 787 A.2d 284 (2001) (holding that the Unemployment Compensation Act sets forth a single governing standard of willful misconduct and rejecting idea that a higher standard may apply based upon the type or nature of *35 the employment involved) and Grieb v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 573 Pa. 594, 827 A.2d 422 (2003) (reiterating that the Unemployment Compensation Act sets forth a single standard regarding willful misconduct and declining to adopt a heightened standard as a public safety exception to the willful misconduct standard).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI-CAMP HILL v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 934 A.2d 1149, 594 Pa. 34, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2110 (Pa. 2007).

934 A.2d 1149 (DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI-CAMP HILL v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Corrections v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
943 A.2d 1011 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)