Department of Children & Families v. P.C.

912 So. 2d 1255, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17181
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2005·No. No. 1D05-0351·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s adjudication of dependency does not include the findings of fact required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.325(c). Even when a parent consents to dependency, the rule provides that the court must make written “findings of fact specifying the act or acts causing dependency, by whom committed, and facts on which the findings are based.” See S.D. v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs., 644 So.2d 607 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); C.S. v. Dep’t of Children & Families; 777 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); I.D.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 779 So.2d 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); McKenzie v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs., 663 So.2d 682 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); S.H. v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs., 642 So.2d 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

ERVIN, BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Children & Families v. P.C., 912 So. 2d 1255, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17181 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

912 So. 2d 1255 (Department of Children & Families v. P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CS v. Department of Children and Families
777 So. 2d 1118 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
McKenzie v. Department of Health
663 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
S.H. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
642 So. 2d 809 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
S.D. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
644 So. 2d 607 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
I.D.M. v. State, Department of Children & Families
779 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)