Department of Children & Families v. Molina

951 So. 2d 1011, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4157, 2007 WL 837223
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 21, 2007·No. No. 3D06-156·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Children and Families (the “Department”) appeals an order of the Public Employees Relations Commission which directed that appellee Belkis Molina be reinstated to her position as family services counselor for the Department. We affirm based on our conclusion that the order is supported by competent substantial evidence. See Glenn v. Dep’t of Prof'l Reg., 410 So.2d 935 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); § 120.68(10), Fla. Stat. (2006).

“When an agency terminates the employment of a career service employee on certain stated grounds, the agency must affirmatively prove the essence of the allegations by a preponderance of the evidence.” Dep’t of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Edwards, 654 So.2d 628, 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (citation omitted). In this case the hearing officer found that the agency’s proof fell short. We are not permitted to re-weigh the evidence. Glenn, 410 So.2d at 935.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Children & Families v. Molina, 951 So. 2d 1011, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4157, 2007 WL 837223 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

951 So. 2d 1011 (Department of Children & Families v. Molina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glenn v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.
410 So. 2d 935 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Dept. of Agriculture v. Edwards
654 So. 2d 628 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)