Department of Children & Families v. In the Interest of L. R.

914 So. 2d 1055, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18692, 2005 WL 3159597
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 2005
DocketNo. 1D05-0645
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 914 So. 2d 1055 (Department of Children & Families v. In the Interest of L. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Children & Families v. In the Interest of L. R., 914 So. 2d 1055, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18692, 2005 WL 3159597 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding that she had signed a written consent to the petition for dependency, the child’s mother was entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard with regard to all proceedings regarding the dependency of her child. J.H. v. Department of Children & Families, 890 So.2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); C.L.R. v. Department of Children & Families, 913 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). This includes entitlement to notice and opportunity to attend the mediation conference involving the father of the child. Because the mother did not receive such notice, the trial court should have granted the motion to set aside the mediation agreement. The order denying the motion to set aside the mediation agreement is therefore REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court with directions to set aside the mediation agreement and to order mediation after proper notice to all parties, including both of the child’s natural parents.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dedge v. Crosby
914 So. 2d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
914 So. 2d 1055, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18692, 2005 WL 3159597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-children-families-v-in-the-interest-of-l-r-fladistctapp-2005.