Department of Children & Families v. Dixon

938 So. 2d 992, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209, 2006 WL 2788218
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 2006·No. No. 4D06-2150·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Considering appellee’s concession of error, we reverse the trial court’s order of dependency. The trial court was without jurisdiction to conduct an adjudicatory hearing because the children turned 18 before the date of the hearing. Also, the court erred in back-dating its order of adjudication to a hearing date where no evidence was taken to substantiate an adjudication of dependency.

POLEN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Children & Families v. Dixon, 938 So. 2d 992, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16209, 2006 WL 2788218 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

938 So. 2d 992 (Department of Children & Families v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of M.P., a child
175 So. 3d 920 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)