DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM vs T.M.V. AND T.J.M., PARENTS OF T.A.M., A CHILD
This text of DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM vs T.M.V. AND T.J.M., PARENTS OF T.A.M., A CHILD (DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM vs T.M.V. AND T.J.M., PARENTS OF T.A.M., A CHILD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM,
Appellants, Case No. 5D22-211 v. LT Case No. 2019-DP-000055
T.M.V., AND T.J.M., PARENTS OF T.A.M., A CHILD,
Appellees.
________________________________/
Decision filed May 18, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Stacy M. Youmans, Judge.
Rachel Batten, of Children’s Legal Services, Brooksville, for Appellant, Department of Children and Families.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Atttorney, of Guardian ad Litem, Tallahassee, for Appellant, Guardian ad Litem. Shannon Reynolds, of Shannon L. Reynolds, P.A., Ocala, for Appellee, T.J.M., Father of T.A.M.
Carl New, Ocala, for Appellee, T.V.M, Mother of T.A.M.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM vs T.M.V. AND T.J.M., PARENTS OF T.A.M., A CHILD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-children-and-families-and-guardian-ad-litem-vs-tmv-and-fladistctapp-2022.