Department of Buildings v. Philco Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Department of Buildings v. Philco Realty Corp.

24 A.D.2d 711, 262 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3404

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 711 (Department of Buildings v. Philco Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Department of Buildings v. Philco Realty Corp., 24 A.D.2d 711, 262 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3404 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on May 29, 1965, denying a motion to direct the receiver to take certain steps in connection with the removal of violations, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Leave, however, is granted to appellants to [712]*712move at Special Term within 20 clays, on notice to the city and tenants with possible interests, to discharge the receiver conditionally on appellants putting up a bond in sufficient amount to assure expeditious renovating of the building, with provision for penal sums to be payable to the city for delays in completing such renovation, and for making appropriate provision for the return of tenants entitled to and manifesting an interest in returning to the renovated building, together with such other terms and provisions as may be deemed proper by Special Term. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on May 29, 1965, denying a motion to direct the receiver to take certain steps in connection with the removal of violations, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Leave, however, is granted to appellants to [712]*712move at Special Term within 20 clays, on notice to the city and tenants with possible interests, to discharge the receiver conditionally on appellants putting up a bond in sufficient amount to assure expeditious renovating of the building, with provision for penal sums to be payable to the city for delays in completing such renovation, and for making appropriate provision for the return of tenants entitled to and manifesting an interest in returning to the renovated building, together with such other terms and provisions as may be deemed proper by Special Term. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 711, 262 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-buildings-v-philco-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1965.