Department of Buildings v. Field

9 A.D. 500
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Patterson, J.

In the condition of the agreed statement of facts as it is presented to us, this matter cannot be considered. It is specifically stated that Mr. Elbridge T. .Gerry is the present owner of the premises mentioned in- the submission. All that is stated with reference to the defendant Field, is, that he became the owner of the property in its' existing condition; but that does not show that he is the owner of the property and that the proceeding is taken against the owner. As we are not authorized to draw any inferences or to import anything into the submission, we cannot act on these papers, but the matter may be resubmitted on a proper statement.

Van Brunt, P. . J., Barrett, Rdmsey and Williams, ■ JJ., concurred.

Leave given to parties, if they shall be so advised, to file additional statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Buildings v. Field, 9 A.D. 500 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

9 A.D. 500 (Department of Buildings v. Field) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herkimer County Light & Power Co. v. Johnson
37 A.D. 257 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)