DePaola v. Taylor
This text of 470 F. App'x 186 (DePaola v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eric Joseph DePaola appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants summary judgment in part on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and entering judgment pursuant to the jury’s verdict in favor of the Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, DePaola v. Taylor, No. 7:10-cv-00398-SGW-PMS (WD.Va. Nov. 18, 2011), and deny DePaola’s motion for production of a transcript at the Government’s expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 F. App'x 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/depaola-v-taylor-ca4-2012.