DePaola v. Albany Medical College

40 A.D.3d 678, 834 N.Y.S.2d 866
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 8, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 40 A.D.3d 678 (DePaola v. Albany Medical College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DePaola v. Albany Medical College, 40 A.D.3d 678, 834 N.Y.S.2d 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated January 18, 2006, which granted the motion of the third-party defendants New York University College of Dentistry and New York University for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the third-party defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint seeking contribution and indemnification. In response to the third-party defendants’ prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a “grave injury” as defined by the statute, the defendant third-party plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Workers’ Compensation Law § 11; Rubeis v [679]*679Aqua Club, Inc., 3 NY3d 408 [2004]; Martelle v City of New York, 31 AD3d 400, 401 [2006]; Angwin v SRF Partnership, 285 AD2d 568, 569 [2001]; Fitzpatrick v Chase Manhattan Bank, 285 AD2d 487 [2001]). Additionally, gross negligence and/or reckless conduct on the part of an employer will not neutralize the exclusivity of the Workers’ Compensation Law as would an intentional tort (see Acevedo v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 189 AD2d 497, 500 [1993]; Briggs v Pymm Thermometer Corp., 147 AD2d 433, 436 [1989]; Orzechowski v Warner-Lambert Co., 92 AD2d 110, 113-117 [1983]).

The defendant third-party plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Fisher, Lifson and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodleaf v. Tzivos Hashem, Inc.
68 A.D.3d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Dechnik v. Fortunato Sons, Inc.
58 A.D.3d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.3d 678, 834 N.Y.S.2d 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/depaola-v-albany-medical-college-nyappdiv-2007.