Depalo v. Lapin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Depalo v. Lapin

79 A.D.3d 599, 912 N.Y.S.2d 880

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 2010·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellants from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered on or about July 2, 2009, and said appeal having been argued by [600] counsel for the respective parties; and. due deliberation having been had thereon, and upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated November 29, 2010, it is unanimously ordered that said appeal be and the same is hereby withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Acosta and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 31443(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellants from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered on or about July 2, 2009, and said appeal having been argued by [600] counsel for the respective parties; and. due deliberation having been had thereon, and upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated November 29, 2010, it is unanimously ordered that said appeal be and the same is hereby withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Acosta and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 31443(U).]

Depalo v. Lapin, 79 A.D.3d 599, 912 N.Y.S.2d 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

79 A.D.3d 599 (Depalo v. Lapin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.