Home/Federal Circuit/Depalma v. Nike, Inc.

Depalma v. Nike, Inc.

25 F. App'x 925
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 30, 2001·No. No. 01-1589·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION

DYK, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Nike, Inc., Canstar Sports Group, Inc., Canstar Sports USA, and Sherwood Drolet Corporation (collectively Bauer) move to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Bernard F. DePalma originally opposed, but has withdrawn his opposition. Bauer replies. DePalma moves to stay proceedings. Bauer requests attorney fees and costs. DePalma opposes.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Bauer’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) DePalma’s motion to stay is moot.

[926] (3) Bauer’s request for attorney fees is denied.

(4) Bauer’s request for costs is granted pursuant to Fed. RApp. P. 39(a)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Depalma v. Nike, Inc., 25 F. App'x 925 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

25 F. App'x 925 (Depalma v. Nike, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.