DePalma v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

DePalma v. City of St. Paul

215 N.W.2d 477, 298 Minn. 570, 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1525

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 1, 1974

DocketNo. 44204

StatusPublished

This text of 215 N.W.2d 477 (DePalma v. City of St. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DePalma v. City of St. Paul, 215 N.W.2d 477, 298 Minn. 570, 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1525 (Mich. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the district court awarding him $2,000 plus interest for the taking of his property by the city of St. Paul. He claims (1) that the trial judge erroneously excluded certain testimony of plaintiff, and (2) that the trial judge erroneously directed a verdict for the amount of damages. We have considered these claims and find them to be without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the district court awarding him $2,000 plus interest for the taking of his property by the city of St. Paul. He claims (1) that the trial judge erroneously excluded certain testimony of plaintiff, and (2) that the trial judge erroneously directed a verdict for the amount of damages. We have considered these claims and find them to be without merit.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 N.W.2d 477, 298 Minn. 570, 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/depalma-v-city-of-st-paul-minn-1974.