DePalma v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

DePalma v. City of St. Paul

215 N.W.2d 477, 298 Minn. 570, 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1525

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 1, 1974·No. No. 44204·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the district court awarding him $2,000 plus interest for the taking of his property by the city of St. Paul. He claims (1) that the trial judge erroneously excluded certain testimony of plaintiff, and (2) that the trial judge erroneously directed a verdict for the amount of damages. We have considered these claims and find them to be without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the district court awarding him $2,000 plus interest for the taking of his property by the city of St. Paul. He claims (1) that the trial judge erroneously excluded certain testimony of plaintiff, and (2) that the trial judge erroneously directed a verdict for the amount of damages. We have considered these claims and find them to be without merit.

Affirmed.

DePalma v. City of St. Paul, 215 N.W.2d 477, 298 Minn. 570, 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1525 (Mich. 1974).

Pincite

215 N.W.2d 477 (DePalma v. City of St. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.