Deodato v. Hartford Insurance Company
This text of 381 A.2d 354 (Deodato v. Hartford Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JOHN DEODATO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges ALLCORN, MORGAN and HORN.
*264 Mr. George J. Sokalski, attorney for appellant (Mr. Peter Peletz, Jr., of counsel).
Messrs. Harwood, Lloyd, Ryan, Kelly, Coyle & Wulster, attorneys for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Rosenberg in his opinion at 143 N.J. Super. 396. See also, Williams v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 151 N.J. Super. 68 (App. Div. 1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 A.2d 354, 154 N.J. Super. 263, 1977 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deodato-v-hartford-insurance-company-njsuperctappdiv-1977.